When Jacob Coxon quit Anthropic, his warning rocked the world. His colleague Evan’s “>10% chance” that AI would “kill all humans” might seem extreme, but it’s not unusual:
Most AI researchers think there’s a 10% chance of AI destroying or disempowering humanity, according to our survey, released today.
https://x.com/AIImpacts/status/2099581080223576403
like this
like this
Today I am trying out wearing drawstring-based underwear. I really like it! Since I've been fat, elastic bands always fold or roll over themselves, unless I get a size that's so big the elastic doesn't even work to hold them up. With a drawstring I can choose the exactly right fit, which is typically much less pinchy/constricting than even a moderately well-fitting pair of underwear. The big downside is that using the bathroom takes an extra 30s or so for tying/untying the drawstring (though, if using a urinal, you can of course use the fly instead).
I originally bought them because they're ~the only literally 100% cellulose-based underwear you can buy (elastic bands are made of mostly spandex/elastane) and I was curious. I think I will buy at least a few more pairs of these, and maybe start wearing them by default.
JP Addison likes this.
Ben Millwood likes this.
Q: Is the AI Impacts survey methodology any good?
A: Yes—I explain in an FAQ:
Ben Millwood likes this.
(warning: posting this for archival purposes rather than because it's interesting at all)
I asked my mom what she remembers her grandparents eating; here's some of what she remembers, a lot of which they grew themselves:
- Potatoes
- Cabbage
- Tomatoes
- Beans and green beans
- Liver and onions
- Chicken
- Eggs
- Pork / ham as a treat
- Blackberries and raspberries
- Rhubarb
- Lettuce
- Homemade bread
- Corn
- Peas
like this
Katja Grace
in reply to Katja Grace • •Katja Grace
in reply to Katja Grace • •We’ve been conducting these surveys since 2016, so we can see how expert opinion has moved over the years.
Two trends:
1) Researchers' 'timelines' to human-level AI have shrunk, fast.
2) Most researchers have seen major future risks of extinction-level catastrophes for a long time, and their concerns are lately trending upward
Katja Grace
in reply to Katja Grace • •1) AI is advancing much faster than researchers expected
2) Catastrophic risks have been looming for a while, and people are increasingly worried
Katja Grace
in reply to Katja Grace • •Katja Grace
in reply to Katja Grace • •Also interesting: many people worry that China will race ahead in AI if the US slows down to avoid human extinction. (It’s unclear to me why China would not also want to slow down in this account).
But Asian researchers in our survey were actually more worried!
https://x.com/AIImpacts/status/2099581081901211878
Katja Grace
in reply to Katja Grace • •https://x.com/AIImpacts/status/2099581078210236850
Katja Grace
in reply to Katja Grace • •